t is useless to try and convince skeptics and the modern “Pharisees”, because even now – as they used to be before- they are extremely intransigent towards anything that causes them to take a distance from their comfortable situation to which they have devoted their priesthood. From those who teach that God’s miracles were only symbolic or pious factual stories forthcoming from a primitive community which doubted about the Real Presence in the Eucharist, how can one expect these people to show an interest for such appearances?

Forgetting that without the appearances of Jesus after the Resurrection, the Church would not have even been born, they deny God and Our Lady the freedom not so much to confirm new doctrines but to get in touch with their children. Or otherwise they don’t care about creating systematic obstructionism.

have always existed in the history of the Church but not with today’s intensity and global extension as in our century, particularly during its second period. But the Church is divided in two factions: on the one side those who genuinely still believe in the supernatural, on the other those who assert that they believe in it but are intent to make history advance at the same time only by means of human effort, of reason ,activity, efficiency, “culture” thus downplaying the Tradition(Eucharist) to a plain inspiration and abstraction. There is a fake(false)ecumenical movement which is denying the Catholic truths with the object of closing a final agreement at any price with the Protestant thought in the name of modern times, whereas in the background signs of non-christianity, of syncretism and New Age, a future new Age of ecological sinners universally dancing around the “golden calf”, tragic parody of a godless palingenesis(=renewal) are making their appearance.

On which side does the successor of Peter stand? Everybody knows the answer, but it might be less known that in the Vatican itself one third is in his favour and two thirds are against him.